In alt.home.repair, on Fri, 5 Feb 2021 07:14:30 -0800 (PST), trader_4
wrote:

On Thursday, February 4, 2021 at 10:58:45 PM UTC-5, Jim Joyce wrote:
On Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:54:49 -0500, micky wrote:

Why do reporters, and this applies just as much when dealing with both
liberals and conservatives, not dig a little deeper than just giving the
interviewee the chance to make a speech?
What you're asking is, why don't they push back when they know something
vague or even untruthful is being said. I think it's as simple as if they
did fact checking in real time, and pushed back as a result, they would
probably find themselves on the outside, looking in, in pretty short order.

Lawmakers don't tend to like it when reporters ask tough questions, in
spite of that being probably the best way to get at the truth. Remember how
Trump used to say, 'That's a nasty question and you're a nasty woman." He
only said out loud what they all probably think when they get a pointed
question.

Odd though how those reporters could ask tough questions,
keep going at Trump,

They asked loads of softball questions of trump. After that blonde's
first question at the debate, few tried good questions.

And they asked loads of hard questions at Hillary.

but pitch mostly softballs to Biden and Democrats.

You don't seem to have read my OP. It was about how they asked softball
questions to Maggie Greene, a Republican.

It's how Trump got
elected.

No.