View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Dean Hoffman[_17_] Dean Hoffman[_17_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 210
Default Smoke detectors, Ionization vs Photoelectric

On 11/29/20 10:07 PM, Sid 03 wrote:
Looking to install some new smoke detectors. I was going to install Ionization type smoke detectors in the lower floors and then a combination smoke and CO detector on the 3rd floor where the bedrooms are located.

I noticed that most of the combo detectors do not use ionization to detect smoke, but use photoelectric type sensors.
Is this a a big deal or should I stick with the most popular ionization type ?
Years ago I was told by a contractor to not install combo detectors, but to keep the CO and Smoke detectors separate ?
Does anyone have an opinion on that ?

If the CO detector has an interconnection wire for other alarms, should you connect it to the interconnection wire for the fire-Alarms ?
All this stuff is manufactured by Kidde, so I am assuming that is all compatible ?

Thanks
Sid.

This is what Consumer Reports has to say. They haven't tested
them for a couple years.

This is as of June 2018.

Consumer Reports wasn't satisfied with any combination
smoke and carbon monoxide detectors they tested then.

These are the dual sensor smoke alarms.
First Alert 3120B $30 Score 91
Kidde P12010 $30 Score 91
First Alert SA320CN $23 Score 87
Kidde P19010 $25 Score 87

Ionization smoke alarms.
First Alert SA9120BCN $25 Score 55
Kidde KN-COSM-1B $35 Score 55 Note 1
Kidde RF-SM-DC $40 Score 53
First Alert SA303 $12 Score 51
First Alert SA304LCN $24 Score 51

Photoelectric smoke alarms
First Alert 7010B $25 Score 55
Nest Protect $129 Score
55 Note 1,2
Nest Protect $129 Score
55 Note 1,2
First Alert SA501CN $60 Score 53 Note 2
First Alert SC051CN $70 Score 53
Note 1,2

1 Combination smoke/carbon-monoxide alarm, also rated as CO alarm.
2 Interconnects wirelessly.