In alt.home.repair, on Wed, 25 Nov 2020 04:18:43 -0600, Dean Hoffman
wrote:

On 11/25/20 2:47 AM, micky wrote:
In alt.home.repair, on Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:31:24 -0500, Andy
wrote:

On 11/24/2020 2:41 PM, Bob F wrote:
On 11/24/2020 9:22 AM, Traitor_Joe wrote:
The Global Times, which is a Chinese Communist Party-run paper, has announced that Joe Biden has won the election and they have instructions for him to follow.

Facing a voracious round of assault from the coronavirus and an economy in doldrums because of the health crisis, the incoming US administration of Joe Biden is hoped to chart a new course of policy interventions – categorically different from the
inertia displayed by Donald Trump’s team.

Seeking China’s material help and rich experiences to contain the infectious disease and rescue a faltering American economy is equally important for the new US government.

…As to the policies of his new administration, the world pins high hopes on him tossing out the old-fashioned and selfish “America First” doctrine, restoring multilateralism and cooperation with the whole world – particularly stopping the reckless and
brutal ideological and economic fight between US and China, which many have likened to a new “cold war”.

…Economic confrontations with China chosen by Trump’s team failed to do the US, or any country in this world, any good. The buying power of Chinese businesses and Chinese households should never be diminished or looked down upon. Australia and Canada,
the two hardcore allies of the US who are very unfriendly toward China, have received a bitter lesson from Beijing. Don’t trample on Chinese people’s bottom lines, otherwise they will bite back.

https://bongino.com/china-publicly-i...ming-joe-biden


the wacko right that just keeps on giving!


Do you think China offers better welfare benefits than the US?

Like it or not, China has done a fantastic job in improving the standard
of living of probably 100's of millions of those who live there.
Given that the starting places in, say, 1950 were so different, I don't
think direct comparisons are useful.

Its government is totalitarian and oppressive, even to the point of
having "spies" on every block to report if a woman got pregnant a second
time**, and I wouldn't like it, but I wouldn't like starving either.
**Although the limit of one has been changed. No time now to look for
details.

Numerous sources say China is still building detention camps. The
adjectives you'll see are concentration and internment.

I'm sure. For the Ouiggers for one. I wrote poorly, listed one
liberalization, and though I said "is totalitarian and oppressive" I
think I still gave the impression they were liberalizing in general.

But still, to clarify the first post::
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-child_policy
" It was introduced in 1979 (after a decade-long two-child policy),[2]
modified beginning in the mid 1980s to allow rural parents a second
child if the first was a daughter, and then lasted three more decades
before the government announced in late 2015 a reversion to a two-child
limit.[3][4] The policy also allowed exceptions for some other groups,
including ethnic minorities. Thus, the term "one-child policy" has been
called a "misnomer", because for nearly 30 of the 36 years that it
existed (1979–2015), about half of all parents in China were allowed to
have a second child.[5][6][7]"

Since it's half of all parents can have 2 and the other half can have 1,
maybe 1 and a half child policy would not be a misnomer.


https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=china+concentration+camps+2020&ia=web
It's back to those old things, money and power. Those are the
same thing
in a sense.