On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 21:32:34 -0700, T wrote:

On 2020-08-07 18:22, Bob F wrote:
On 8/7/2020 4:16 PM, T wrote:
On 2020-08-07 15:51, Snag wrote:
On 8/7/2020 3:27 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 8/7/2020 8:11 AM, Snag wrote:
On 8/6/2020 9:25 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 8/6/2020 6:46 PM, Muggles wrote:
Ed Pawlowski Wrote in message:r
On 8/6/2020 2:24 PM, Grumpy Old White Guy wrote: This is yet
another reason why I will NEVER EVER vote for a democrat.*
They're stupid and evil!
https://fellowamericandaily.com/bust...faced-blm-mob/
Half agree.* She should not have* used the case in a
political campaign.Should they be charged?* Not sure, Castle
doctrine may or may not apply since it was outside and no
specific threat made. I'll let the judge figure out the
technicalities of it. Possibly a brandishing charge?Pop them one
at a time as they come through the door and it is easy to figure
out.

....

No specific threat?

They were a mob of people who broke onto private property.


They did not break into their property.* Big difference in the
castle law.* They should have stayed inside the door.

** One of the "demonstrators" is on video saying that he broke the
gate . Once they came thru that broken gate they were fair game .
Several hundred people come pouring onto my property making threats
I'm opening fire .

Get the whole story.* They broke a community gate, not their private
property.* They were going down the street.

** I've seen video of the "protesters" on the McCloskeys' lawn . Moot
point anyway , that street is also private property , owned by the
homeowners in that gated community - and they are property owners ,
making that also their property . Any way you cut it Ed , they felt
that their lives were threatened and they acted appropriately and
within the law . Kim Gardner is totally outside the law with her
attempts to charge and punish them .


No fooling.

The one thing that has surprised me over all this
lawlessness is the absolute restraint shown by the
victims of it.* I would have thought bullets would
have flown by now


I'm sure you would have been happy to murder a few dozen people.
Fortunately for themselves, the McCloskeys showed more restraint than
you want to.

When someone is threatening you or someone else with
deadly force you get to use deadly force in defense

That sounds shaky. I don't think I'll be taking legal advice from you.

Tell me, what was the deadly force used by all those
children your side murders every year? You clearly
believe the strong get to butcher the weak.

You mean like they did in your bible?