On 13/07/2020 18:50, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:56:16 +0100, RayL12 wrote:

On 24/06/2020 18:33, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:20:27 +0100, RayL12 wrote:

On 23/06/2020 21:28, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:50:36 +0100, RayL12
wrote:

On 21/06/2020 15:47, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:41:30 +0100, Cindy Hamilton
wrote:

On Sunday, June 21, 2020 at 9:53:25 AM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey
wrote:
This:
https://www.amazon.com/Shade-Beyond-.../dp/B01G2W7IT0





Clearly designed to shield people from sun and rain. But isn't
rectangular more sensible? Triangles have those narrow corners in
three places where they shield virtually nothing.

Rectangular awnings are stodgy and boring. Triangular awnings are
more to the taste of design professionals.

You're not wrong about their utility.

Pah, have a rectangular one with a pretty picture on it then. A
triangular one shields virtually nothing so's utterly pointless.
You
wouldn't buy a pretty car that doesn't start.


16ft*3 isn't small is it? Depending on angles, that could create a
large
shadow area.

With three very narrow parts.

With angles and distance those 'narrow shadows' could be on the
nextdoor
property.

Which would what, cause a court case?


Cover your legs, which will be in your own property under a bigger
shadow.

How can a shadow cover a shadow?


My response was to the fact that someone said a triangle creates a
narrowing shade which will not cover the whole body. And yes, a shadow
can cover another shadow.