On Wed, 13 May 2020 17:58:53 +0100, "michael adams"
wrote:


"Pomegranate *******" wrote in message
.. .

On 9 May 2020 19:22:10 GMT, Tim+ wrote:


Perhaps if you phrased your questions using conventional grammar and
English you might get better responses?

Tim

Speaking of grammar, your senttence didn't need a question mark.

It's a claim which is capable of argument, not an undisputed
fact; and so merits a question mark. Given that ...

a) It's quite possible to frame questions in impeccable grammar and
English to which there are no sensible answers. i.e. What colour is
Tuesday ?

b) It's quite possible to frame intelligible questions which would
get a responsem despite using unconventional grammar, i.e.
" This Regent Street ?"

And while you're at it, look up Skitt's Law.


michael adams

...

Responsem?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus