In message , "Dave Plowman (News)"
writes
In article ,
Tim Lamb wrote:
In message , John
Rumm writes
On 27/04/2020 22:14, alan_m wrote:
On 27/04/2020 16:00, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
alan_m wrote:
On 27/04/2020 13:52, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

But how many might be rather annoyed to buy a replacement TV from a
supermarket etc, only to discover their aerial no longer plugs in?


Or the SCART socket is missing ?

Very true. More to the point why no phono sound outputs? Given most
have a
headphone socket which I've never used? ;-)

You are out of touch - no headphone sockets now as you connect
headphones via bluetooth

And get to enjoy a visible delay between what you see and what you hear
as a side benefit!

Not noticed here. Gifted Bose headphones and linked to the LG TV. as
instructed he-) What does bother slightly is the stereo effects
appear badly balanced.

That's OK, then. You pay a premium for something that doesn't work as
well. ;-)

Umm. As said elsewhere, the basic need is for me to enjoy TV without
bothering the boss!

TV stereo sound is new to me and with age related hearing
frequency/volume issues slightly disturbing. Are you saying that
earphones will never give a balanced reproduction or that I need better
equipment?

I suppose the old Westerns etc. that I watch would not have been
produced with stereo anyway. A bit disconcerting to have the left ear
full of some *stage left* police siren but nothing apparent to the right
ear.


--
Tim Lamb