Brian Gaff (Sofa 2) wrote

Actually, some of us feel we provide a public service and all for free, if
all of us volunteers did not do what we do, there would be a lot less
services out there for the vulnerable. I think we should be on the
protected register, but many of us are older and seen as vulnerable
ourselves To me if we DO get the virus, then its up to us to be sure not
to infect others as far as we can, but there is no such thing as total
isolation.

There is actually if you have decent stocks at home
and arent stupid enough to insist that you must
have exactly what you would normally have.

You do need food,

But its trivial to have decent stocks of food.

you do now need to get that food in person

No you do not.

since people shopping on your behalf are being turned away as hoarders.

That’s bull****. And trivial to prove that you
are in fact getting the food for someone else.

"Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote in message
...
My friend has agoraphobia and I think it is a bit unkind of him to send
me this email ...

"......the country is 90% plus idiots, you realise that 90% is too low a
figure

this is evident from the soft language being used by the guvmint to get
people to stop unnecessary socialising and stay at home

they talk about realising it being such a huge big ask and such a huge
sacrifice.......awwww diddums, boohoo..........

this whole pussy footing around is exactly what a weak parent does trying
to cajole a baby

.......and there is the point, they obviously (or subconsciously) realise
they are talking to a complete nation of great big spoiled babies that
require infantile cajoling

pathetic how these babies can't content themselves at home given the
consequences of not doing so"


wish he wouldn't copy my posting style as well...tee hee