On Wednesday, 26 February 2020 19:32:04 UTC, #Paul wrote:
tabbypurr wrote:

I wasn't *advocating* anything, just giving the motivation. And

my point was that there is no motivation, there is no upside.

There was at least one motivation, which has indeed been advanced
as a future strategy, and I wrote it out for you to read. Just
because you personally do not happen to find it sufficiently
convincing does not make that motivation vanish.

I might, for example, think that someone's motivation for voting
remain (or leave) was somehow flawed. But the existence of that
motivation is not dependent of my view on its merits (or lack
thereof).

you think it makes sense because you don't understand it fully. But we tackled that already.


All systems get replaced as they age and fail.

Yup. And an added round of compulsory replacement across the
board is hardly helpful.

Well, if a change to all-electric (or even all-gas, or all-nuclear)
were part of the natural replacement of systems (perhaps "as they
age and fail", as I had indeed written), it wouldn't be an added
round, would it?

Do you understand what is involved in installing a GSHP system?


NT