View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Steve Walker[_5_] Steve Walker[_5_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,080
Default Question for our Dave

On 04/02/2020 22:15, Robin wrote:
On 04/02/2020 20:13, Tim Lamb wrote:
snip
On the ULEZ data protection issue, surely
notification of an offence would also be breaching DP? Perhaps they
have given themselves special dispensation.


The ULEZ is a charging scheme made under the GLA Act 1999 which gives
them statutory power to issue penalty charges to registered keepers. And
of course when they post it to the registered keeper they don't have the
problem of verifying identity as they do when someone phones or emails
them.

For completeness, it seems to me that someone who suspects a partner
could access the information if they set up an account so the charge is
paid automatically.Â* I suspect - but don't know - that avoids problems
with data protection because they verify that the person registering to
pay is the registered keeper.


What if someone who is not the registered keeper, but uses the vehicle,
needs to register to pay?

SteveW