Amateur radio - maintaining the technical standards
T i m wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:10:51 +0000, Gareth Evans
wrote:
In the groups.io group, rsgb-workshop, those who might
be considered to be the bell-wethers of amateur radio
are bemoaning the decline in technical standards,
especially among USA Extra class licensees who know
not where to connect their SWR bridges :-(
Test for you then ... I'd like to build a simple FM broadcast receiver
that I can tune (and lock) to R4 for our daughter to listen to when
she's out walking the dog.
A kit would be nice but I don't want anything that scans, unless it
can be locked on a single freq (93.2 MHz?) at startup?
I think it would only need to drive a small speaker or single
headphone.
Cheers, T i m
There are several ICs designed for something similar. I have, or had (Im
not sure where they are) a couple of cheap €˜Chinese radios someone gave me
which were about the size of a match box. They had a couple of buttons to
control the volume to a pair of ear phones and a couple to scan. FM only. I
think the ear phone cable doubled as the antenna. I used then while walking
before I bought an iPod.
The case was clearish plastic and, as I recall, there was only one IC and a
few support components inside- plus the batteries.
I saw similar ones on sale for a few pounds.
Considering the price/simplicity etc, the performance wasnt bad- certainly
good enough for casual listening while walking etc.
The only niggle, you had to scan through stations to find the one you
wanted, although I think I remained tuned to the last one used when turned
off and back on.
Try a google for €˜single ic fm receiver.
|