Thread: Those 2 royals
View Single Post
  #39   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
mm0fmf[_2_] mm0fmf[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 267
Default Those 2 royals

On 12/01/2020 19:09, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 13:12:27 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

From: Cursitor Doom
Subject: Those 2 royals
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 20:45
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y

I also find it extremely vexing when this pair are
described in the media as "senior royals." That term really only
properly applies to the Queen, Philip, Charles and Anne.


Ah, okay now I have the context I can see what you mean.


Both Wills and Harry are more senior than Anne in terms of accession.
Despite your hypothesis about the parentage of Harry.


Not my hypothesis, Dave. Pretty much an established fact!

Fact?

Here's a few facts. Harry born Sep 1984 which, unless royals are indeed
lizards, means he was conceived around Christmas 1983.

Diana met Hewitt for the first time in Summer 1986.

Maybe they're time travelling lizards?

Still it's good for selling papers and keep conspiracy theorists happy.
Oh, and those who can't do maths.