"tim..." wrote in message
...


"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...


"tim..." wrote in message
...


"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...


"tim..." wrote in message
...


"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...


"Andrew" wrote in message
...
On 08/12/2019 04:14, Bill Wright wrote:
On 07/12/2019 14:35, Richard wrote:
On 07/12/2019 12:46, Bill Wright wrote:
On 07/12/2019 09:43, wrote:
On Saturday, 7 December 2019 02:58:50 UTC, Bill Wright wrote:
I'm old enough to remember Window Tax.

But you wuz too poor to 'ave windows :-)

Owain

We had the windows but not the glass.

Bill

Better than having the glass and no windows.

No because you could sell the glass and buy shoes.

Corbyns new window tax is really going to hurt some people.

Nope, because there is no chance that he will be the govt.

unfortunately,

there is

Dont believe it.

The issue is the possibility of tactical voting by some to avoid letting
Boris become PM.

There isnt even remotely enough tactical voting
to make up for the need for 100 more seats for a
Labour/LD coalition to do better than the Torys.

it's not 100

It is with the number of seats a Labour/LD coalition
needs to have more seats than the Torys.

30 would do it

Nope, because most of the seats that change
would be from Labour to the LD and so wouldnt
affect the total for a Labour/LD coalition.

(you've forgotten the SDP)

Nope, you have forgotten that most of the seats
that will change will be from, Labour to the LD,

Thats not anything like possible by tactical voting
given that so few are into tactical voting.

There is never going to be a coalition between
a rabid Trot/Marxist Labour and the LD,

Yours is just wishful thinking, northing like reality.