Thread: Voted
View Single Post
  #87   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Ray[_22_] Ray[_22_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 209
Default Voted



"Dave Liquorice" wrote in message
idual.net...
On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 07:35:04 +0000, Richard wrote:

The right thing is sustainable population. That doesn't mean enough food
to feed the pestilence, it means a population that does not adversely
affect the balance.


+1

The right thing to do is cull several billion, but that is deemed
extreme.


Only because no one wants to decide who would be culled or if you
just let people die, who should be allowed to have children.

Natural calamities will just have to do, or a new top level predator
might be cool.


Natures working on it. Won't be some thing with pointy teeth that
leaps out and eats you but something we can't see, like a bacteria or
virus (or group of).


But we know how to get on top of those very quickly now
and even HIV/AIDS flu and even ebola can't do it anymore.