View Single Post
  #186   Report Post  
Posted to uk.radio.amateur,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.d-i-y
The Natural Philosopher[_2_] The Natural Philosopher[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39,563
Default Supreme Court

On 27/09/2019 10:12, Joe wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:40:51 +0100
"michael adams" mjadams25@ukonline wrote:



a) Supposing for one awful moment that such a thing could happen,
is it ever permissable for a Prime minister of the UK to lie to the
Monarch in the course of his duties ?


I think it must be, because we are discussing the repercussions of the
behaviour of a PM of the UK who lied not only to Parliament, but the
entire country, including the Queen, and was never prosecuted or even
sanctioned by Parliament. It clearly *is* permissible.

But Blair hadnt been PM for years and neither has John Major???


--
€œI know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the
greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most
obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of
conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which
they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by
thread, into the fabric of their lives.€

ۥ Leo Tolstoy