On 2019-09-26, The Todal wrote:
On 26/09/2019 10:27, Norman Wells wrote:
On 26/09/2019 10:10, The Todal wrote:
On 26/09/2019 09:58, Incubus wrote:
On 2019-09-25, The Todal wrote:
On 25/09/2019 10:18, Norman Wells wrote:

Labour is acting purely out of self-interest in preventing an election
when the national interest is crying out for one.Â* It is the first
opposition in history that seems unwilling to face the electorate
to get itself elected.

And what sort of opposition is that?Â* It needs to be replaced too.

It will be replaced by the Tory opposition. Labour will form the next
government.

You really are living in cloud cuckoo land if you truly believe that.
It's
difficult to take anything you say seriously if you are that out of
touch with
reality.

We'll see whether I'm right, in the fulness of time. The electorate
will have a difficult choice to make, that's certainly true. The
incompetent boorish Etonian, the elderly Marxist terrorist sympathiser
and extremist or the arrogant Head Girl of the Lib Dems who wants to
discard all Leave voters. I think ultimately the Labour manifesto will
get the most support.

The Tories would do a lot better if they could find a way of getting
rid of Boris Johnson before the election

That's a Labour fantasy.Â* The Tories know they have a proven winner in
Boris.Â* Labour knows that he is immensely more popular with the public
than the 'elderly Marxist terrorist sympathiser and extremist', and is
therefore extremely dangerous to their election prospects.Â* They would
love to see the end of Boris; they can't win unless they gat it.

But they won't.

That's a Tory fantasy. Boris has always been much more popular with Tory
voters than with the electorate at large.

And - oh dear, poor BJ. It's leaking away.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/n...rsal-0cx3dmlbz

A third of voters €” 33 per cent €” now believe that the prime minister is
competent, according to the latest YouGov survey for The Times. That is
down from 41 per cent three weeks ago. At that time 52 per cent also
believed that he was strong, but that figure, too, has fallen, to 46 per
cent.

Sixty-one per cent of voters believed Mr Johnson to be decisive at the
start of the month but only 54 per cent do now.




but since the man does not have the integrity to tender his
resignation that won't be possible.

Why should he resign?Â* He ventured into uncharted waters, which even the
English High Court said would be OK, unfortunately got into
difficulties, and was only told *after the event* that he shouldn't have
done it.


Wrong. As I've explained to you before, the English High Court said that
the issue is non-justiciable. It didn't say that his behaviour was okay.
Once you concede that the issue is justiciable you are driven to the
conclusion (as stated clearly in the Supreme Court judgment) that he has
offered no explanation let alone a reasonable explanation for proroguing
the House for a long period. His behaviour is inexcusable. He should
have the courage to resign, but Boris "King of the World" Johnson would
never resign.

Remind me once again who advised Boris Johnson that he could prorogue
Parliament?