On 26/09/2019 10:10, The Todal wrote:
On 26/09/2019 09:58, Incubus wrote:
On 2019-09-25, The Todal wrote:
On 25/09/2019 10:18, Norman Wells wrote:

Labour is acting purely out of self-interest in preventing an election
when the national interest is crying out for one.Â* It is the first
opposition in history that seems unwilling to face the electorate to
get itself elected.

And what sort of opposition is that?Â* It needs to be replaced too.

It will be replaced by the Tory opposition. Labour will form the next
government.

You really are living in cloud cuckoo land if you truly believe that.
It's
difficult to take anything you say seriously if you are that out of
touch with
reality.

We'll see whether I'm right, in the fulness of time. The electorate will
have a difficult choice to make, that's certainly true. The incompetent
boorish Etonian, the elderly Marxist terrorist sympathiser and extremist
or the arrogant Head Girl of the Lib Dems who wants to discard all Leave
voters. I think ultimately the Labour manifesto will get the most support.

The Tories would do a lot better if they could find a way of getting rid
of Boris Johnson before the election

That's a Labour fantasy. The Tories know they have a proven winner in
Boris. Labour knows that he is immensely more popular with the public
than the 'elderly Marxist terrorist sympathiser and extremist', and is
therefore extremely dangerous to their election prospects. They would
love to see the end of Boris; they can't win unless they gat it.

But they won't.

but since the man does not have
the integrity to tender his resignation that won't be possible.

Why should he resign? He ventured into uncharted waters, which even the
English High Court said would be OK, unfortunately got into
difficulties, and was only told *after the event* that he shouldn't have
done it.