In article ,
Incubus wrote:
On 2019-09-25, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Tim Streater wrote:
That you try to insist that somehow the referendum is different from
ordinary elections in that the pre-election bumf must be 100% accurate
and must be complete and cover all possible eventualities. Only a fool
would expect that.

You don't see any difference between a once in a lifetime decision, and
one which can be reversed every 5 years or less?

Just how many instances in a lifetime would we have to vote on this
issue, then? If once isn't even, would two get the job done? What if
people say things that Snopes disagrees with? Will there then be a
third?

The job has been done. So no need for a second referendum. Unless
parliament can't agree on a deal. And a decent deal is what leave promised.

--
*How about "never"? Is "never" good for you?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.