On 2019-09-25, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Tim Streater wrote:
That you try to insist that somehow the referendum is different from
ordinary elections in that the pre-election bumf must be 100% accurate
and must be complete and cover all possible eventualities. Only a fool
would expect that.

You don't see any difference between a once in a lifetime decision, and
one which can be reversed every 5 years or less?

Just how many instances in a lifetime would we have to vote on this issue,
then? If once isn't even, would two get the job done? What if people say
things that Snopes disagrees with? Will there then be a third?