On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:43:30 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 25/09/2019 11:36, abelard wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:01:59 +0100, Ian Jackson
wrote:

In message , Spike
writes
On 25/09/2019 08:14, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , "dennis@home" wrote:

We have already seen he will use illegal prorogue to try and stifle
debate and he will use an election to do the same.

Not illegal as it broke no law.

I'm certain that the BBC's R4 female interviewer of Jeremy Corbyn used
the term 'illegal' to describe the PM's prorogation, and hardly
surprisingly it wasn't challenged. At least, I'm pretty sure that's what
happened, but ICBA to listen to BBC Sound's catch-up for ~2h20 to see if
I'm right - there's no way of skipping through the recording.

In Corbyn's speech yesterday, he never once use the word 'unlawful'. It
was always 'illegal'. [You know, there ARE times when I do worry about
Jeremy.]

i do believe he used another (dishonest) word...

it's all the minions and reptiles that keep using 'illegal'

agent cob is far more dangerous than bliar as he is more intelligent
No, he is stupider, but he is equally as dangerous if not more so
because he is stupider.

he is more mad than he is stupid...

he actually believes his own guff...working within those
premises, he is more rational/intelligent than bliar


do not underestimate the would-be fuehrer

No.


--
www.abelard.org