On 25/09/2019 11:22, Spike wrote:
On 25/09/2019 09:00, Tim Streater wrote:
Spike wrote:
On 24/09/2019 17:19, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

Are you saying you voted without listening/reading any of the arguments
for and against?

I wasn't aware that that was a requirement - when did it become law?

Surely you don't fall for the claptrap put forward at election time? Now

You must be incredibly well informed. Or rather stupid.

I formed a view on the EEC, and have since seen no reason to change it.
Perhaps I see a bigger picture than you do.

Our Dave is very blinkered.

So I'm beginning to understand.

I formed my view (that the EU is not fit
for purpose) back in the early 2000's, having been quite supportive up
to then.

Perhaps we can see a 'bigger picture' than Plowman? One not obtained
from electioneering pamphlets?

Didn't a judge rule that it's OK for politicians to lie during election
campaigns, as no-one was expected to believe them anyway? It might be
that's where he's going wrong.

It is ceratinly the case that they are exempt from charges of making
false claims in political advertising

t



--
I would rather have questions that cannot be answered...
....than to have answers that cannot be questioned

Richard Feynman