View Single Post
  #26   Report Post  
Posted to uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.d-i-y
The Natural Philosopher[_2_] The Natural Philosopher[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39,563
Default Supreme Court

On 25/09/2019 07:49, Ian Jackson wrote:
But at the risk of being boring.......

When so much of the information that The People were given - and on
which they based their decision - was wrong (either because it was
speculative over-pessimism or over-optimism, or deliberate lies intended
to deceive), who in their right mind would insist on ploughing ahead and
implementing that decision without referring the matter back to The
People for reconsideration?


Anyone who believes in democracy

I would have said at the time exactly the same about Tony Bliars
election with a far smaller perecentage of the electorate.

Democracy means going with what people decide no matter if your
propaganda didn't stick and the other lots did.

Democracy is there for conflict resolution, not arriving at the 'right'
answer.




--
Truth welcomes investigation because truth knows investigation will lead
to converts. It is deception that uses all the other techniques.