View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
charles charles is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,061
Default Prorouging and the Supreme Court

In article ,
T i m wrote:
On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 15:12:09 +0100, wrote:


snip


One point he made - and the interested should really go listen for
themselves - was that the nature of the political process meant
that the decision (here) was at least felt to be made with sufficient
popular support, thus giving it natural democratic legitimacy;


snip


This is the crux of it for me for the whole Brexit process and could
so easily been resolved by:


1) Leaving the referendum to be the advisory poll it should only have
ever been and / or


if you read the Supreme Court's judgement you will see that,
constitutionally, it was only advisory, but the Government decided to
honour the result

2) Requiring any decision to require a supermajority providing a
'clear will of the people' as you reflect above (50%+1 is not
'sufficient popular support' and hence doesn't (hasn't) gained
'natural democratic legitimacy, IMHO).


Ironically the latter was the very requirement Firage insisted would
be needed for him to consider a Remain win.


Cheers, T i m


--
from KT24 in Surrey, England
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle