Supreme Court
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 24/09/2019 11:43, The Todal wrote:
On 24/09/2019 11:40, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 24/09/2019 11:04, abelard wrote:
On 24 Sep 2019 10:02:27 GMT, Stephen Cole
wrote:
Supreme LOL, more like.
Bercow's demanding Parliament meet ASAP, PMQs tomorrow? :-D
The ****'s really hit the fan here. Quite remarkable scenes.
bliar et al have deliberately and heavily undermined the rule of law..
these are natural consequences
but what next?
I wonder how people would act if they realised the true ramifications...
The supreme court - a Blairite invention - has ruled the Bercow is
emperor and that a parliament that is strongly in favour of revoking
article 50 is now acting as the the government, which has been
stripped of its executive powers, and that there is no need to have
an election at all for years.
Democracy is nearly dead now.
I suppose Leave supporters do have difficulty with literacy.
If you missed Lady Hale's speech this morning here it is.
I heard her speech.
The reconvening of parliament is in Bercow's hands
The introduction of legislation is in Bercow's hands, and parliaments.
The government has no majority.
But Parliament will not hold an election.
The full horror of Blairs attack on democracy and its institutions is
now apparent
Blair may have invented the Supreme Court, but in what way would the old
HoL law lords have been prevented from doing exactly the same thing?
Serious question.
--
Roger Hayter
|