Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Brian Reay wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
bert wrote:
Odd really. Brexiteers are all so convinced a no deal exit is what the
people voted for. But very against a second referendum where that belief
could be tested.

Not at all. It's remainers who insist people didn't vote for a
no-deal brexit whereas in fact it was made perfectly clear during
the referendum campaign by both sides that it was a possible outcome
if negotiations did not succeed.

Really? Then there was no need for leave to tell us the EU would be a
pushover and give in to our every demand? They need us more than we
need them? And so on?

Remain did try and tell us what would happen with no deal. Screams of
project fear from leavers. But oddly no one predicted the present
fiasco.


Just because you didn‘t predict the EU would be so difficult‘ (to put
it mildly) doesn‘t mean others didn‘t.

Not up to me to predict anything when being reasonably happy with the
status quo. Up to those who wanted change to say what exactly they wanted,
and how it is to be achieved. If they wished others to see their point if
view.

The problem is, you and your fellow Remainers are convinced you know what
others, in particular Leavers, think / believe.

And that is down to leavers not having anywhere near as united reasons to
leave as remain had to stay. If you can't agree among yourselves, how do
you except others to understand you?

You focus all your bile and bigotry into trying to convince yourself that
we are wrong and you are blessed with infallibility.

Perhaps being a teacher has made you think you can simply impose your
views on others? Rather than show them the method and way they were
arrived at?


Im not trying to impose anything.

There was a Vote. The result was leave.

It was made clear the result would be honoured.

Im just expecting that to be done.

Im not trying to tell people what they think etc. Or impose my views on
others. I expect a democratic vote to be honoured.