On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 19:44:23 +0100, ARW
wrote:

On 26/08/2019 21:54, T i m wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:15:58 +0100, ARW
wrote:

snip

I almost gave up when you suggested that "the dog might be council
property".


Shame you didn't (for your sake). ;-(

See, there are guard / patrol dogs (for example) that who are actually
owned by companies, allocated to employees and are simply 'tools of
their trade'.

Similar with dogs used by the Army and other K9 services and where
they are often destroyed when retired from service because of their
'search and attack' / 'protection' training. ;-(

But then you knew all that didn't you Adam ... ;-)

Keep it going.

Thanks?

There was no way it was a council owned dog, for a start
it was not wearing a hi viz vest..

Who said it was?

If it was a council dog it would have done the two day course and been
taught to wear a lead.

Yeah ... shrug

Cheers, T i m