In article ,
michael adams wrote:

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote:
Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath
contempt Steve.

I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of
medication. Why aren't you, Brian?

Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter?

Is it really necessary to ask such a question ?

It shouldn't be.

Children with cancer or any other serious illness always
attract the greatest sympathy as they stand to lose far
more years of life than do adults. They never get the chance
to fulfil their potential or conversley to chance to
show that they never really had any to start with.

So you think them more important than say a young mother or father
bringing up a family?

If Corbyn wasn't completely gormless he would right now be
asking for categorical guarentees from both Johnson and Gove
that no child with cancer will die as a result of a
shortage of medication following a No Deal Brexit.

No if or buts but a straightforward guarentee.

Why just cancer? Anyone suffering from anything as a direct result of a no
deal Brexit is important too.

--
*I want it all and I want it delivered

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.