"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...


"michael adams" wrote in message
...

"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote:
Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath
contempt Steve.

I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of
medication. Why aren't you, Brian?

Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter?

Is it really necessary to ask such a question ?

Children with cancer or any other serious illness always
attract the greatest sympathy as they stand to lose far
more years of life than do adults. They never get the chance
to fulfil their potential or conversley to chance to
show that they never really had any to start with.

If Corbyn wasn't completely gormless he would right now be
asking for categorical guarentees from both Johnson and Gove
that no child with cancer will die as a result of a
shortage of medication following a No Deal Brexit.

No if or buts but a straightforward guarentee.

Completely silly. No one can every guarantee
that no child with cancer will never die and
when one does, its never going to be possible
to know what killed them.

And do you honestly think such niceties and fine distinctions
i.e "the truth" will be the main concern of "Sun", "Star",
"Express" or "Daily Mail" readers when Corbyn's question and
the politicians "obvious" evasions of the question make
front page news ?

Kiddies, cancer, cover-ups, if you're a journalist or the Leader
of Her Majesties Opposition, what's not to like ?

You really are quite gormless. But in responding to your posts
occasionally I see myself as explaining things to the sort of
gormless person you seem to represent. And who might otherwise
be still in the dark.

You're not a distant relative of Jeremy Corbyn by any chance
are you ?


michael adams

....