On 14/08/2019 12:18, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 13/08/2019 23:37, John Rumm wrote:
Indeed, although while hydrogen fuel cycle efficiency is horrid[1], it
does have some quite attractive aspects that allows it to be used and
deployed in much the same way and with similar infrastructure as used
for petrol/diesel - quick refilling, bulk road/rail distribution as
well as manufacture on site.

No. NONE of those things are in any way simiar to carbon based fuels

apart from all the ones that are of course...

It is te smallest atom you can get.

and?

It leak through the smallest of holes
It is highly explosive.

So is petrol.

It has a very low flashpoint

and petrol

It needs to be kept under pressure.

Like any liquefied gas then

It chills when it expands

Like any liquefied gas then

It is extremly low energ dnsity by VOLUME so nees massive tanks.

Higher than batteries though...

It only makes any sense with abundant nuclear generating capacity
obviously.

It doesnt make sense even then.

Others would disagree with you... time will tell.




--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/