View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Commander Kinsey Commander Kinsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,540
Default 1 In 6 Teachers Need Second Jobs

On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 20:55:44 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 22:54:47 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 20:59:40 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Sun, 21 Jul 2019 20:36:24 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 01:47:27 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news I know everything there is to know about teaching.

You clearly dont when you keep rabbiting on about lesson plans.

I saw them planning them.

But couldnt see what else they did in their classrooms.

I saw plenty, I was often in a room doing repairs while a lesson was
going on.

But have no idea what they do when not at school.

I did talk to them you know.

But have no idea what they do when not at school.


Well unless they were lying....


Or exaggerating...


About what?

Lesson plans are only a small part of teaching, stupid.

But they're the thing teachers claim to need hours of unpaid
work
to
do
in
the evenings.

Thats bull**** too, because many do share lesson plans.

And those ones enjoy lots of free time.

Wrong as always, when they spend it marking and
working out how to get the best out of some students.

One of the most sensible teachers I knew worked 9 to 5. Once he
went
home he stopped working.

Irrelevant to what most do.

It's what they can do if they wish.

Hardly any are stupid enough to stay in the school till 5

9 to 5 is an expression, in our case it was 8:30 to 3:30.

Hardly any of the teachers can get away with
not doing anything outside those hours.


I knew quite a few that did.


Sure, the time servers/hopeless teachers.


Nope, plenty managed to teach using only a standard working week.

Within those hours they get free periods or non contact time where they
aren't teaching.


Doesnt happen with primary schools.


Primary schools don't need preparation. How hard can it be to teach times tables?

Some managed to do all the marking and preparation then, and over lunch.


So they're not forced to work long hours.

Makes more sense to spend the time between 3:30 and 5 at home.

Most did, but working.

Try that again in english.


They spent it at home, but were working.


The opposite of what you said above.


I did not. I said they don't need to spend more than a standard working week working.

Same with your even sillier stuff about taxation.

I am quite familiar with tax, having been taxed and seen what
the
government spends it on without my authorisation.

Thats how taxation works, stupid. Its never going to
be feasible to make those affected by crime or terrorist
activity to pay for the cops and courts involved in
dealing with criminals and terrorists. It has to be
paid for by taxation, whether you like that or not.

Most things could be made pay per use.

Most infrastructure couldnt.

Most of our taxes goes to **** we just don't need.

Thats pig ignorant bull**** too.

What do I get form the government? Bin collections. Roads. I
don't
need anything else from them.

You clearly did with medical services alone.

I got less out of them than I've given them in taxes.

You dont pay them anything in taxes.

I did for 12 years.

The average payment to the NHS is £300 per taxpayer.

Not what you pay. You pay nothing and nothing like what it
costs to provide you with services. You're a tax dodging parasite;


Maybe so,


No maybe about it.


Look up what "maybe so" means.

but it's clearly wrong to take £300 a month form the average taxpayer.


They dont take £300 a month from the average taxpayer and give it to the
NHS


https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/58...-going-to-rise

IF you want healthcare, get insurance, or take a risk and pay when you
need it.


Stupid way to do things, that costs twice a much.


Why would it? And the point is it costs you only if you use it and choose to use it.

Way too much. Anyone needing £300 a month in doctors

Thats nothing even remotely like the average.


What do you think it is?


You made that stupid claim...


Yet you have no idea what you think it is instead.

should be put out of their misery.

Yep, you should have been executed by lethal injection.


I agree. No point wasting money curing the uncurable.


So top yourself because thats what you are.


I'd only mess it up and cost the taxpayer money in care. Look at what Simon did with the bridge.

And they paid for your education too.

While I was being educated, my parents were paying the taxes for that.

You quite sure you aint one of those rocket
scientist completely unemployable ****wits ?

You quite sure you aren't misunderstanding the 4th dimension? I can't
pay for something that happened in the past.

Corse you can, its called a debt, stupid.


A debt for 30 years?


Common with a mortgage, stupid.


Pretty daft for an entity as large as the government to borrow money.

How stupid of the government.


The debt for the napoleonic wars still hasnt been paid off
and that was a ****ing sight more than 30 years ago.

And paid your mortgage when you got the bums rush, again.

Not much of it.

Far more than you ever pay in taxes.

Bull****.

Fact.


Nope,


Yep.


Interest only, and only for a certain number of months.

they only pay it for a short time, then say get a job.


And you couldnt even manage to do that.


Not my fault I'm ill.

They only paid the interest, and for a short time.

They should have given you the bums rush.


Maybe so,


No maybe about it.


For ****'s sake look that phrase up.

but I might aswell take it, since they've stolen it from me in the past.


You didnt even come close to paying what you cost them.


Then I win.

Even if you don't pay income tax, you still pay fuel duty and VAT.


And dont even come close to paying what you cost them.


Fuel duty alone costs me a fortune. It's more than the fuel itself!

For example schools. You pay money per child you have.

That wouldnt work with the dregs of society who
are precisely the ones who need some education
to make them employable so they dont get benefits
for life when they are as unemployable as you.

Bull****.

Fact.

The dregs fail to get decent grades

Dont need to get decent grades. What matters
is that they can read and write and all but the
blind and crippled can do both.

They still don't get jobs because the non-dregs take the jobs.

Thats bull**** when the unemployment rate is as low as it is.

Everyone can read and write,

Because their education is paid for by taxes.

But that ability is pointless.

Corse it isnt, it makes them employable, stupid.


Most minimum wage jobs don't need literacy.


BULL****. Have fun listing even one that doesnt.


Binman. Gardener.

Anyway, kids learn to read from their parents.


Wrong again with the bulk of the dregs that end up on welfare


Their problem. Have a kid, don't teach it to read, it dies of starvation. End of genetic line.

You really don't need a school for that.


Even sillier than you usually manage and thats saying something.


Just how hard do you think it is to teach someone to read?

yet there are thousands round here not clever enough to do any jobs at all.

Like you.

They can't hold down a MacDonalds job.

You can't hold down any job anywhere.

Because I'm ill, nothing to do with my intelligence.

Bull****. You were too stupid to even get qualified in
an area where there are jobs where you prefer to 'live'


I just picked the course I was best at,


And that was complete stupid when there are
no jobs in that area where you prefer to 'live'


I couldn't have predicted what would be available in the future.

Plus, why go for a degree I wasn't sure I could pass?

We might have been doing space travel by now


No chance and it wouldnt be done where you chose to 'live' anyway,


We bloody should be up there by now, but we waste money on stupid things..

and just waste tax payers money getting "educated".

Thats bull**** when they are made employable.

No point when there are less jobs than workers.

There isnt.

There most certainly is.

Bull****.

Every time I've applied for a job there are about 100-200 applicants.

Those are the ones pretending to apply so they dont get their benefits
stopped.

Not at that level of work.

Bull****.


Those who never work apply for McDonalds jobs, not ones requiring a
degree.


They actually apply for any job at all so they keep getting benefits.


And then have to take one or they lose the benefits.

We should only educate those with brains.

Even sillier than you usually manage with the
worst of the dregs. We no longer turn out
any kids who can't read and write anymore.

I don't care if the dimwits can't read.

You have always been completely irrelevant.
What you may or may not care about in spades.

What's the point in educating the dregs.

Much cheaper than benefits for life because they are unemployable.

Why educate a binman?

Because they need to be able to read the roster,
read the street signs, read the labels on the bin
machine, read the instructions on what do do
about fools like you that can't put the right
stuff in the right bins, etc etc etc.

Moving bins about doesn't require literacy or numeracy.

Even sillier than you usually manage, and thats saying something.

And there was clearly no point in educating you, no one who stuffs
catalogs
thru letterbox slots need a degree in theoretical physics to do that..


I do that because I can't get up before 10:30.


You choose not to. If someone said you'd be shot if you
didnt get up before 10:30, youd get up before 10:30


And if I had to do it every day I'd probably be dead by now. It ****s me in the head just doing it once every few weeks.

And if they're going to be binmen, they might aswell not go to school
at
all.

They still need to be able to read the roster and
get too and from work and park at work etc.

They cant even get a license to
drive the truck if they can't read.

Only one drives the truck.

Thats all we have, the one driving the truck.
We arent actually stupid enough to have
anyone running around moving bins, the
residents put the bin out on the road verge
where the truck picks the bin up and emp[ys
it into the truck and puts it back on the ground.


They only do that in one county here (Stirling).


Yep, you clowns are that stupid.

It doesn't seem to be very common, probably cheaper to employ people than
maintain all those mechanisms.


Corse it isnt. It costs sweet **** all to maintain those
mechanisms and there is a just the ****ing great thing
that grabs the bin and tips it into the back of the truck.


But it relies on other things, like the bin owners placing them precisely, and no parked cars being in the way. Tell me, can those devices turn a bin round? Can they hoist a bin over a parked car?

They claim they have preparation.

They do, even if they use a lesson plan prepared by someone else.

You really need to pick a side and stick to it.

Nope, the real world isnt black and white.

It is if you want it to be.

Just another of your silly little drug crazed drunken pig ignorant
fantasys.

I see you have no reply then. You lose.

Just another of your silly little drug crazed drunken pig ignorant
fantasys.


Repeating yourself won't help your side of the argument.


Corse you never ever repeat yourself with that silly **** about
what you were stupid enough to get qualified in, eh ?


Only when you keep asking the same damn questions.

Typical government employees in a left wing society run by ****ing
unions.

Even yours isnt run by unions anymore.

Really?

Yep.

People go on strike all the time.

**** all of them do.

Firemen, railway workers, etc. Fire the lot of them.

And watch your hovel burn. Great idea.

Since we have ludicrously high unemployment,

Just another of your silly little drug crazed drunken pig ignorant
fantasys.

it would be easy to hire new ones. Ones that actually want to work.

Just another of your silly little drug crazed drunken pig ignorant
fantasys.

Why on earth should companies be forced to pay people who refuse to
work?

Yep, it should have been a bullet in the back of the neck for you.


I have never gone on strike.


But you refuse to work before 10:30


But I don't expect to be paid while I'm not working, strikers do.

I was asked to do so once and told the union to **** off.

You're not one of those psycho lefties like traitor4 are you?

Nope, I believe that the completely unemployables like you
would be getting a bullet in the back of the neck and turned
into pet food.


But you stated that you think unions and striking are a good thing.


I never ever did anything of the sort.


ME: Firemen, railway workers, etc. Fire the lot of them.
YOU: And watch your hovel burn. Great idea.