"harry" wrote in message
...
On Thursday, 2 May 2019 20:09:40 UTC+1, John Rumm wrote:
On 02/05/2019 15:27, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , John
Rumm wrote:

On 02/05/2019 06:41, harry wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 May 2019 18:27:01 UTC+1, tony sayer wrote:
In article ,
harry scribeth thus

Nobody has a viable/economic solution to dispose of the nuclear
waste.

Glassify it and bury it deep its not impossible just theres a lot of
FUD
on the subject..

So why is nobody doing it?

They are, and have been doing so for quite some time:

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/WR...fied-waste-110

1187.html

"The new melter was installed by liquid waste contractor Savannah
River Remediation (SRR). It is the third melter in the 20-year history
of the facility, and replaced Melter 2 which reached the end of its
operational life in 2017 after 14 years of operation. In that time,
Melter 2 poured 10. 8 million pounds (4900 tonnes) of glass into 2819
canisters"

Now perhaps harry will stop with his ******** that "no one knows what
to do with the waste".

I doubt it, harry is resistant to pretty much any information that does
not support his biases and preconceptions.

How many times have you seen him post a link to a site that he claims
supports his argument, and it turns out he either never read it, or just
failed to comprehend what it says, since it actually does the complete
opposite?

Tell me what is happening to nuclear waste in the UK.

The UK is completely irrelevant, even with UK power generation nukes.

Clue:-
https://ukinventory.nda.gov.uk/wp-co...ntory-2016.pdf

That almost entirely what is the result of the production of nuclear
weapons, stupid.

No permanent solution here! Just aspirations.

Dont need a permanent solution when it can be reprocessed later, stupid.