In article ,
John Rumm wrote:
On 01/05/2019 13:43, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
John Rumm wrote:
Are you saying there is no point in reducing CO2? Got to be all or nothing?

No, I am suggesting that its unwise to opt for a solution that only
has a limited reduction effect, and once implemented, will make it
much harder to achieve any further reductions - thus taking the
option of "nothing" off the table.

Especially when you consider we already have existing proven
technology that goes straight to "nothing" in one hit.

But "we" don't have such technology. We'd have to buy it in.

Well that's a legacy you get from listening to green nimbys for decades
after being world leaders in the field...

We buy in all the renewable generating kit as well.

And you really blame that on green nimbies?

Nor is the
latest technology 'proven' either.

You don't have to have the latest, just working.

All so easy, isn't it?

--
*Can vegetarians eat animal crackers?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.