On 01/05/2019 13:43, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
John Rumm wrote:
Are you saying there is no point in reducing CO2? Got to be all or nothing?

No, I am suggesting that its unwise to opt for a solution that only has
a limited reduction effect, and once implemented, will make it much
harder to achieve any further reductions - thus taking the option of
"nothing" off the table.

Especially when you consider we already have existing proven technology
that goes straight to "nothing" in one hit.

But "we" don't have such technology. We'd have to buy it in.

Well that's a legacy you get from listening to green nimbys for decades
after being world leaders in the field...

We buy in all the renewable generating kit as well.

Nor is the
latest technology 'proven' either.

You don't have to have the latest, just working.



--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/