"trader_4" wrote in message
...
On Sunday, April 14, 2019 at 3:06:20 PM UTC-4, Rod Speed wrote:
"trader_4" wrote in message
...
On Sunday, April 14, 2019 at 1:26:18 PM UTC-4, Rod Speed wrote:
"trader_4" wrote in message
...
On Saturday, April 13, 2019 at 10:27:50 PM UTC-4, Rod Speed wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:18:21 -0400, Home Guy
wrote:

While needlessly full-quoting, wrote:

Manning only did 7 years and we had it red handed for
over a dozen espionage charges while in uniform. In any earlier
time
that should have been the firing squad.

For exposing US war crimes, Manning should have been put to
death?

Do you know how sickening that is?

And you bomb, invade, destabilize and destroy other countries
when
you
think (or when you false-flag) war crimes are happening there.

There are no bigger hypocrits and schizophrenics on planet earth
than
americans.

Do you remember what the Pentagon Papers were all about?

Do you really want to bury your head that far down deep into your
ass
and kill those that expose your country's war crimes?

Is that how sick your are as a person, or a country?

I am just not sure I want privates in the army to be able to
decide
which secrets are OK to release and which ones are not.

Doesn't matter what you want.

Buried in a big data dump like that can contain information
about agents in the field or operations that are still active.

Just as true of what Elsberg exposed.

BS. Ellsberg did not hand over raw, unfiltered data from cables and
the like, which is what Manning did. He handed over a study of the
US involvement in the Vietnam War, which was very unlikely to have
any
identifying information in it that could expose US agents, methods,
etc.

Thats bull**** on the methods.

The Pentagon had prepared it and there was no
reason to ever put that kind of information in it.

Thats bull**** on the methods and if it was that useless
to anyone why did it have such a high security rating ?

That's stupid even for you.

We'll see...

The Pentagon Paper were classified because it was
a review of how the US got into the war, how it got
escalated, it's status, what the reality was, etc.

And that includes METHODS, ****wit.

So then provide us with some examples of the classified
intel methods that were disclosed in the PP. You can't.

It wasnt just INTEL methods, ****wit.

That doesn't mean that names of agents, intel methods, etc
were needed to be in there. It had been written and reviewed
with the intention of it being distributed within the govt, anything
that could disclose agents, methods, etc, would have been taken
out. And further, it went to NY Times and WAPO, who would try
not to print anything they thought would endanger anyone or methods.

Not even possible with the METHODS in the pentagon papers.

That's very different than a Snowden or Manning just dumping raw files.

No it is not. The same attempt to not endangering individuals was done.

So, cite for us the individuals endangered by the PP.

Never said there were any. I clearly said METHODS, ****wit.

Noted that you couldnt cite even a single individual
endangered by what Manning or Snowden exposed.