On 04/05/2019 12:28 PM, Frank wrote:
On 4/4/2019 8:28 AM, Terry Coombs wrote:
On 4/3/2019 7:48 PM, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2019 17:25:39 GMT, (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:

If you thing a handful of assault rifles in the peoples hands will have
any affect on an "oppressive government", you haven't been paying
attention
to recent world history.
Check your facts. Say America has 4% of the world's population and has
42% of the guns in the world. Ask Senator Feinstein.

Then read about the Oath Keepers. Guns are my natural right birth.

If you are offended, ask me if I give ****.

spit

What Scott doesn't realize or refuses to acknowledge is that a
large percentage of those arms are owned by people with military
training and COMBAT EXPERIENCE . You don't have to own your own tank
to kill one of "theirs" . And antipersonnel armaments rely on catching
the "enemy" in groups . Ask any 'Nam vet how well that worked . Plus
the fact that at least a percentage of current military will be
sympathetic to the cause ... and will either refuse to fight or defect
- with their gear and as much armament as they can carry off . I don't
own an AR type rifle , don't feel the need . But I support the rights
of those who do .


Back during the cold war the Russians were very concerned that if they
invaded us that most of us were armed.

The Russians know a lot about being invaded and overcoming a technically
superior foe with an endless supply of Ivans.