On 4/5/2019 4:07 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Frank "frank writes:
On 4/4/2019 8:28 AM, Terry Coombs wrote:
On 4/3/2019 7:48 PM, Oren wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2019 17:25:39 GMT, (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:

If you thing a handful of assault rifles in the peoples hands will have
any affect on an "oppressive government", you haven't been paying
attention
to recent world history.
Check your facts. Say America has 4% of the world's population and has
42% of the guns in the world. Ask Senator Feinstein.

Then read about the Oath Keepers.ÂÂ* Guns are my natural right birth.

If you are offended, ask me if I give ****.

spit

ÂÂ* What Scott doesn't realize or refuses to acknowledge is that a large
percentage of those arms are owned by people with military training and
COMBAT EXPERIENCE . You don't have to own your own tank to kill one of
"theirs" . And antipersonnel armaments rely on catching the "enemy" in
groups . Ask any 'Nam vet how well that worked . Plus the fact that at
least a percentage of current military will be sympathetic to the cause
... and will either refuse to fight or defect - with their gear and as
much armament as they can carry off . I don't own an AR type rifle ,
don't feel the need . But I support the rights of those who do .


Back during the cold war the Russians were very concerned that if they
invaded us that most of us were armed.

I'm sure you must have a citation to a source which confirms that
the Russians were so concerned. Note that _Red Dawn_ isn't a citation
that I would accept.

I have it somewhere in my library. Think it was from a soviet military
defector. Try to find it yourself.