View Single Post
  #216   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Rod Speed Rod Speed is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 40,893
Default mixing light bulbs



"trader_4" wrote in message
...
On Wednesday, March 6, 2019 at 11:05:02 AM UTC-5, Rod Speed wrote:
"trader_4" wrote in message
...
On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 8:47:09 PM UTC-5, Rod Speed wrote:
"trader_4" wrote in message
...
On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 at 3:06:48 PM UTC-5, Rod Speed wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 20:30:00 +1100, "Rod Speed"
wrote:



wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:03:12 +1100, "Rod Speed"


And with a sole trader self employed, THEIR TOTAL
TURNOVER IS THEIR GROSS INCOME, ****wit.

none of the rest of your even sillier **** worth
bothering with, all flushed where it belongs

That just means more SPs would form a type S corporation.
It is actually a pretty trivial thing to do. When I did it the
lawyers
charged me a few hundred bucks.

It isnt that easy with the other ones that have a very high gross
income and a much lower income for income tax purposes.

What "Other ones"?

Most obvious with stock market speculators/day traders
and property flippers etc.

If you think you will have a business or tax reason to form an
"S"
you
can.

But not if its gambling or speculation.

What? More BS spewing from the hole of ignorance that you've dug?

We'll see...

You're like a black hole, sucking at everything, but spewing out
crap
too.
A subchapter S is commonly used for real estate, which can be
speculation.

But fretwell has the the 2% surtax on the corporation GROSS


That's a lie,


We'll see...

he never said anything about corporations when he made the proposal


Yes, but later said that he wanted corporations included.



Again, that's a lie. He only made some vague reference to wanting to
see big corporations who pay no taxes now, pay some kind of tax.
He did not say it was his 2% new tax, which again, he clearly proposed
in the context of individual income taxes. And now, Fretwell is playing
cute, refusing to answer the very simple question I've asked several
times now.



reams of your repetitive **** and lies flushed where they belong


You mean like when you claimed that a Sub S corp can't be used for
speculation?


Never ever said anything even remotely like that, you silly little
pathological liar. And since all you can do is lie thru your ****ing
teeth, here goes the chain on all the rest of your bare faced lies.