On 03/03/2019 06:58 AM, wrote:
On Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 8:35:10 AM UTC-5, Frank wrote:
On 3/3/2019 8:05 AM, wrote:
On Saturday, March 2, 2019 at 11:01:15 PM UTC-5, rbowman wrote:
On 03/02/2019 01:32 PM, Clare Snyder wrote:
That's the sad part - the"asshole in charge" doesn't realise he is
to govern for the good of ALL the people, not just his small crime
family inner circle, or his "chearleaders" (ever notice inhigh school
the "chear leaders" were generally not "the sharpest knives in the
block" but more likely the good-looking airheads????)

Do you think the pant-suited bitch who referred to half the electorate
as deplorables would govern for ALL the people? Do you think Romney
would make it past 47% of the people?

The US government. from its inception, has not governed for the benefit
of ALL the people.

Just out of curiosity, what do you have against pant suits? I haven't worn
a skirt in more than 20 years.

Cindy Hamilton


I suspect he has nothing against pant suits but is against this
particular wearer.

Then why mention the pants suit?

Feeling triggered, are we? Clinton is the one who made pant suits a
cliche. Blame her.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/14/hill...-happened.html

"Clinton writes that during the presidential campaign, she wanted to
dress as she did when she wasn't running for president. This would also
help her "not overthink it."

That certainly didn't work well.