Thread
:
Rechargable batteries for DECT cordless phones - is there a problem with getting too high a mAhr rating?
View Single Post
#
22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
bert[_7_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 3,556
Rechargable batteries for DECT cordless phones - is there a problem with getting too high a mAhr rating?
In article ,
writes
On 07/02/2019 13:02, Jim K.. wrote:
"NY" Wrote in message:
The bog standard rechargeable batteries (750 mAhr) in our DECT phones are
starting to lose their ability to hold their charge: they indicate full
charge but the phone cuts out with "low battery" within a few minutes of
being taken off the charging base station, especially if used on
speakerphone.
Is there a problem with replacing them with batteries that can hold more
charge ie 750 mAhr. I presume the phone will still charge them at its
standard rate (though it may take longer to charge them).
I will go for branded (eg Duracell) rechargeable batteries.
I presume that if the original batteries are NiMH, I should go for that same
technology.
I believe it's because they are always on their pedestals being
(over) charged that the NiMH rechargeable batts die young. I've
just replaced another set in a cordless handset & am not leaving
it on the charging stand, only when it needs a charge...
Ours (Siemens c47) are always in their cradles when not being used but
the original Chinese NiMH batteries are still OK after nearly 9 years.
Maybe some phones have better charging control than others.
Same here. I've only changed ours once and that was after a similar time
period. I have however replaced one handset as the charger proved to be
faulty. Got a replacement 2nd hand on ebay from Holland.
--
bert
Reply With Quote
bert[_7_]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by bert[_7_]