"trader_4" wrote in message
...
On Saturday, January 26, 2019 at 2:17:39 PM UTC-5, Rod Speed wrote:
"trader_4" wrote in message
...
On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 4:42:12 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:35:29 -0800 (PST), trader_4
wrote:

"has taught me the lesson of not getting a plumber to work on your
well".

What part of that is so hard to understand?

Nothing. What part of the rest that actually goes to my point and that
you omitted is hard to understand for you?

"Plumber would not take a partial hit on his bill but I paid him
anyway.

My plumber who did good work in the past and will now be history has
taught me the lesson of not getting a plumber to work on your well."


Frank expected the plumber to take the hit on his bill for his
legitimate
work because he has a ****ty well that collapsed. The plumber didn't
collapse it. The plumber, in fact, left him with a functioning well!
And now the plumber, who did good work in the past, and by the account
of what happened here, also did good work on the well, is now blamed.

He didnt blame him for anything.

Frank's mad that he wouldn't discount the work,

Not mad so much as irritated.

and he dumped him from doing future work.

Only on the well, because the well company is better value with wells.

The plumber can't drill a well, ****wit.

Still would have been better value to call the well
company with the original well problem, ****wit.

And by bitching that the plumber wouldn't cut his bill and saying
that the plumber, despite having done good work in the past, is
now history, means to me that he's done with him for good.

More fool you.

"My plumber who did good work in the past and will now be history "

Pity about the bit quoted at the top.

reams of your **** any 2 year old could leave for dead flushed where it
belongs