View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
Jack Jack is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,278
Default Quick Question on Accufence

On 1/3/2019 1:19 PM, Leon wrote:
On 1/3/2019 7:29 AM, Jack wrote:
On 1/2/2019 4:56 PM, -MIKE- wrote:
We're not talking about the side extensions.
We're talking out an out-feed table.


Well actually the OP he never mentioned out feed table. I read
extension table to mean "extension table". And yes if you add an
extension table, and especially if you add to a 50" rip capacity the
back rail is needed to support and prevent sag of the extension table.

Oops... yeah, I guess he didn't. Next time I need to read gooder.


I took him to mean out feed table as well. Extension wings could also
be what he meant. At any rate, IF he meant out feed table then there
is no need to butt the table to the saw. In fact a bit of space is
desirable to allow fingers under the wood to easily lift wood from the
table.

If he meant extension wings, then the back rail should have not
interfere with butting a table to the saw. It might be needed as Leon
explained but should in no way interfere with the task.


Actually the support bar on the back side might ease attachment to the
back of the saw for the out feed, if that was what he meant.


Yes, that's how I use mine. Bonus is t leaves just enough space for my
fingers to get under a piece of wood I just cut. I also have a cabinet
on wheels that butts up that table.

--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com