On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 16:35:47 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:53:48 -0000, Clare Snyder
wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2019 16:42:21 -0000, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:

On Tue, 01 Jan 2019 16:19:36 -0000, danny burstein
wrote:
In "Commander Kinsey"
writes:

How's about starting off the new year with a resolution
to research issues a bit more closely. Like, in this
case, how much power those motors are drawing when
running today versus 30 years ago.

Which has nothing to do with insulation.

Bzzt. They're all interconnected.

And your rants have nothing to do with reality or
thinking.

Find a five year old to explain basic thermodynamics
to you.

A lower power motor does not affect the R value of the insulation. Are
you quite mad? Do you really think if you put a more efficient
boiler in your house that your house will magically gain better
insulation and cool more slowly?
It doesn't affect the R value of the insulation but it may addect
the run time of the compressor which is your only half-baked clue
that your new freezer has no better insulation than your old one.

You've made an invalid assumption. Every modern freezer I've seen
runs for the same time as older ones, and they cool at the same rate.
So clearly the compressor outputs the same cooling, but using less
electricity. All well and good, but I can feel the cold escaping
from the unit. And I notice the compressor has to keep running just
as often as it used to,. So obviously the insulation sux. Oh and
also, just have a look at the energy consumption ratings, which vary
by a factor of 4 between different models. Looks like a a lot of
them are rubbish.

Make, model and age?

Take your pick and explain the difference of 5 to 19p running cost:
https://www.sust-it.net/energy-savin...freezers-large