wrote in message
...
On Thursday, 27 December 2018 18:58:43 UTC, Rod Speed wrote:
tabbypurr wrote in message
...
On Thursday, 27 December 2018 18:06:23 UTC, Rod Speed wrote:
tabbypurr wrote in message
...

What better for the spooks than a phone that crims
think they're safe with, but the spooks can read.
What better for Apple than a product buyers
think is more secure than all the others.

Sure, but its just a tad unlikely that the spooks would
organise for a terrorist to kill 25 people and then kill
themselves just to produce a media frenzy like we

are you a lunatic or an idiot? Oh, for a moment I forgot, you're both.

You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag.

Thats the event that saw the FBI want to look at the contents of that
iphone.

saw with that court action which actually showed
that they could actually get into that particular
obsolete iphone and found nothing useful in it.

the court thing was likely to convince
everyone the phones were secure.

Its just a tad unlikely that the spooks would
organise for a terrorist to kill 25 people and then kill
themselves just to produce a media frenzy like we saw.

Both sides win.

The FBI didnt, they looked completely stupid trying
to get the court to force apple to let them see what
was on that iphone and even sillier with the 3rd
party allowed them to do that and there was
nothing useful on it after that mega**** fight.

? We'll never know.

We do in fact know that the current iphones are so
secure that even apple can't perve at the data on them.

let us know when you're sober and can take stuff in.

You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag.