View Single Post
  #442   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
Kristy Ogilvie Kristy Ogilvie is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 63
Default nuclear thermal generators, was: How does a thermocouple ...

On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:33:02 -0000, Rod Speed wrote:



"Fred Johnson" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 23:52:47 -0000, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Fred Johnson" wrote in message
news On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:21:28 -0000, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Fred Johnson" wrote in message
news On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 04:02:00 -0000, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Bruce Farquhar" wrote in message
news On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 22:38:42 -0000, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Bruce Farquhar" wrote in message
news On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 03:11:20 -0000, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Bruce Farquhar" wrote in message
news On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:15:38 -0000, Rod Speed

wrote:

And that's not what caused TMI, Chernobyl and Fukushima anyway.

I thought TMI and Chernobyl were both human error/stupidity?

Only Chernobyl.

TMI and Fukushima were certainly due to human error/stupidity at
the
design stage.

There you go then, human error can occur anywhere.

But with something as important as a nuke, the checks
should ensure that they don't get thru to the final product.

Should. But if there are enough morons, faults get overlooked.

Its isnt enough morons, it's the lack of checks. That's how
Fukushima ended up with its backup generators where they
could be taken out by a tsunami that was known to happen there.

And with TMI, no one bothered to check that the user interface
on the indications of loss of coolant water did make it easy to
see what was actually happening with the coolant level. In fact
it was so misleading they they thought it had too much coolant
when it fact it was much too little, so they pumped out even more
and eventually the consequences of that saw the venting of
radioactive material. Which was nothing like that a coal fired
power station of the same size would do routinely.

We're saying the same thing. Humans just aren't bright enough to
design
things properly.

Must be why we are still 'living' caves and
running around stark naked everywhere.

Can we cure the common cold?

That remains to be seen. Currently we have a problem with
vaccination with infectious disease that mutates too fast.
It remains to be seen if we can invent some way of doing
vaccination that works on the bits that don't change as fast.


Should have been done by now.


Easy to claim given how long it took to invent vaccination.


Look at how much we've done with mobile phones and computers. But we don't even know how our own bodies work yet.

Cancer?


That remains to been too.


Also should have been done by now.


Remains to be seen if its even possible.


Half of them can now be cured.

My high blood pressure?


Yes, bullet in the back of the neck cures that trivially.
And contraceptives avoid you showing up in the first place.


Your means are questionable.


Nope, it's a guaranteed cure.


I would argue that you are not using the word cure correctly.

Also works for the common cold and cancer as well.

Can we send people to other planets?


Corse we can. Only problem is that they arrive there dead currently.


That wasn't what I was asking


You have always been, and always will be, completely
and utterly irrelevant. What you may or may not claim
to have asked in spades.


Not my fault Aussies can't understand the Queen's English.

Just count how many stupid things on your car could have been made
better at no extra cost.


None of those in my car. A few things are missing like
cruise control, but that would obviously cost more.


Why are hazard light switches not in a common place on all cars?


Because hardly anyone wants to change the way they currently do theirs.


But I see it in different places within the models of one manufacturer.