On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 11:05:13 PM UTC-4, micky wrote:
In alt.home.repair, on Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:23:09 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 1:34:18 AM UTC-4, ChairMan wrote:
rbowman wrote:
On 10/30/2018 08:06 AM, micky wrote:
Dunghead Donnie lies again. Claims the US is the only
country with
when actually there are 30.

Excluding Canada that leaves 29 ********s where a lot of
the citizens
appear to want to be someplace else.

Actually it leaves 28, the US is one of the 30, too. Look at
the countries that have already reversed that idiotic idea.

https://www.numbersusa.com/content/l...tizenship.html

Another question I haven't seen anyone in the media address is what
is the position of these 30 other countries on births to illegal
aliens? Just because they recognize birthright citizenship for
people in the country legally, doesn't necessarily mean they are
OK with it for illegals.

It would be nice if someone from the media did this, but someone on one
side or the other could also do it.

Why don't you do it? Oh, I know, you won't say which side you're on.
Coward.




The anti-change-law folks have
presented their case, that 30 nations have birthright, so it seems fair
for the pro-change would present a rebuttal, if it turns out that a
substantial share of the 30 do make an exception for illegals. BUT, that
would require them to admit that there are more countries than just the
US and it would make Stumpie look either stupid or a liar, so that's a
problem for them.

WTF? If only 30 follow birthright, then ~160 don't! And why does it matter
what some other countries do? You have close to that number that follow
Sharia law. Should we do that too?






And the next question is, how many illegals
are coming into the country? If you have good immigration enforcement
and the stream of illegals is small, it's not such a big problem.
When you're being flooded, with caravans on the way, then it is.

I woudln't be at all surprised if the current caravan was started by a
few of Trump's agents, just to get his voters worked up.


It's possible, but it's far more likely it was supported and funded by
the radical libs, aka the Democrats. It's the Democrats that you support
that want open borders and to let that caravan right on in. Still waiting
for your answers:

Where do you stand on the birthright issue?

Where do you stand on sanctuary cities and states?

Do you agree with the Democrats that say ICE should be abolished?

Should we stop that caravan, or just let them right on in?


THOSE are the real issues. But of course you won't weigh in, because you
obviously either agree with your Democratic Party on all that or being the
partisan, you won't say anything negative about them. It's always a
Republican.