Thread
:
smoke alarms ....
View Single Post
#
17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
Brian Gaff
external usenet poster
Posts: 10,998
smoke alarms ....
No but one added thing to take into account. Most people tend to site them
on the ceiling. This is not a good idea if you have to climb to change a
battery or stop it sounding cos you burned the toast. I have one half way up
the stairs which may mean it gets more toast falls alarms but is easy to
shut up without getting a ladder or falling.
Brian
--
----- --
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"Peter Parry" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 21:12:48 +0100, "Jim GM4DHJ ..."
wrote:
are optical smoke alarms better for less false alarms than ionising
ones...in practice I mean ? .....
No. Neither have significant false alarm rates. Both however can
suffer nuisance alarms, these are not false alarms but real alarms
produced by non- dangerous activities such as steam from a bathroom
or overheated toast.
Optical suffer more from steam, ionisation from the combustion
products of things like singed toast. Used and sited properly neither
should have a significant nuisance alarm rate (unless of course you
are prone to overheating toast with the toaster is in the bathroom
sink while you are taking a shower).
Reply With Quote
Brian Gaff
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Brian Gaff