On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 10:33:30 +0100, whisky-dave wrote:

On Thursday, 6 September 2018 21:53:54 UTC+1, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Thu, 06 Sep 2018 21:42:43 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message
news On Thu, 06 Sep 2018 11:03:40 +0100, tim...
wrote:



"bert" wrote in message
news In article ,
whisky-dave writes

But if they are so good why do they require a human at the wheel ?

Because they are not THAT good. And probably never will be because they
may never get through the "nearly good enough" stage.

I think that they easily ought to manage it for motorway & country road
driving (with a fall back to the driver during congestion). It's in town
where they may struggle.

Unfortunately, it's the self driving in town that is the use case that
makes
most sense from a social pov.

Having a car which I can set to autopilot on the motorway is a nice to
have,
it isn't a game changer - except perhaps for trucks.

There's no reason a computer can't do the simple operation of driving a
car.

There is when the sensors arent economically viable like
when the road is under water or covered with snow.

Why could a camera not cope with snow?

It's difficult seeing through snow, it sort of optically opaque.

No harder than for a human.

For goodness sake even some women manage it (just).

A likely story.

Have you ever seen a Sheila try to drive?

Is yuor middle name Sheila, yuo couldn;t even avoid hitting a bloody deer and most deers aren't that small but you can't see them it seems.

It crossed the road without looking. I had right of way.