On Mon, 03 Sep 2018 19:24:57 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Jimmy Wilkinson Knife" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 03 Sep 2018 13:30:40 +0100, whisky-dave
wrote:

On Saturday, 1 September 2018 21:59:36 UTC+1, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2018 20:54:02 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote
Rod Speed wrote

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-0...sting/10190804

The report doesn't say whose fault it was.

But it does list a hell of a lot of other similar failures
and a well designed self driving car should drive the
car so it doesn't cause human drivers to run into the
back of the car its driving because of how it drives.

And of course human drivers never **** up like this....

Which is why people don't want to spend £1000s on a self driving car that
****s up or kills them, they can have that for free NOW.

No, they get 20 times less ****ups.

That number is straight from your arse.

No, it's from a study.

There are no self driving cars which don't have
a human in them to react when it ****s up

But it's not actually needed, as the computer is better than a human would be.

and we
don't even have any viable stats on the relative
accident rate of self driving cars with members
of the public as the overriding human either.

Don't need them, we already know the computer is 20 times better than a human.