On Mon, 03 Sep 2018 16:06:21 +0100, whisky-dave wrote:

On Monday, 3 September 2018 14:50:32 UTC+1, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Mon, 03 Sep 2018 13:30:40 +0100, whisky-dave wrote:

On Saturday, 1 September 2018 21:59:36 UTC+1, Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2018 20:54:02 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:

Jimmy Wilkinson Knife wrote
Rod Speed wrote

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-0...sting/10190804

The report doesn't say whose fault it was.

But it does list a hell of a lot of other similar failures
and a well designed self driving car should drive the
car so it doesn't cause human drivers to run into the
back of the car its driving because of how it drives.

And of course human drivers never **** up like this....

Which is why people don't want to spend £1000s on a self driving car that ****s up or kills them, they can have that for free NOW.

No, they get 20 times less ****ups.

The California DMV said it has received it has received 95 autonomous vehicle collision reports as of August 31. Dozens of companies have received permits to test self-driving vehicles on California roads, but those permits require the presence of a human safety driver.

Just how amny of these atomomous cars are there a few dozen comparded to....

You say 95 collisions with autonomous vehicles, but you don't say how many manually driven cars have had collisions.