On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:25:38 +0100, "dennis@home"
wrote:

On 29/06/2018 08:22, Tim Streater wrote:
snip

For the purposes of this discussion, it is.


So that you can prove something that actually wors doesn't and for you
to win a false argument!

Sounds par for the course.

Then you claim to be using physics.

The actual names for it are 'guesswork' and 'hunches'. Same rules as
the used for Brexit of course.

You must be a failed climate scientist who thinks proving the impossible
by changing the laws of physics is a good thing.

No, he's a failed Media Studies student who had to then do Fine Arts.
;-)

What he isn't is an Engineer, that's for sure as some of the stuff
he's be coming out with are soooo bizarre easily demonstrate.

Cheers, T i m